6 thoughts on “The Bible Verse Cited In The Charlie Kirk Murder Trial

  1. There’s no way Robinson killed Charlie Kirk with a “thirty-aught-six” rifle. This is just part of the theater.

      1. A thirty-aught-six rifle would have made Kirk’s neck explode. It didn’t even go thru! Do they have the bullet? They are claiming whatever served as the bullet FELL out the entry wound. Definitely not a thirty-aught-six. None of the story of his disassembling the rifle and getting off that roof with it (the film of that contradicts) is coherent.

        A better case can be made that Kirk’s exploding microphone (a Mossad specialty) created that wound. Residue of which could have been found…except that there was an “emergency” pave over of the crime scene. Funny thing about that. Candace Owens and few others are digging into it. Since Israel’s takeover of Kirk’s organization, no one there seems interested in who killed Kirk. Joe Kent’s unit was specifically forbidden from investigating any foreign involvement. As intriguing as Trump’s lack of interest in what happened at Butler.

        1. That’s pretty intriguing, J. Sobran. I know there has been much heated discussion about the assassination back and forth; and I had not constructed an opinion about that. I suppose we should see if they are able to convict this young man. If there is reasonable doubt, the jury is not supposed to convict. If that is true– that they say the bullet fell out of the entry wound, and that his neck did not “explode”, then that certainly would seem to rule out certain types of ammunition. It would make no sense.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *