How Did the Hamas Terrorists Pull Off Their Attacks?

Reasonable observers are correct to question what happened in Israel three weeks ago. The nation’s border security, surveillance capabilities and military are among the most advanced in the world. Yet, extremely low-tech Hamas terrorists were able to breach their heavily fortified border and operate unrestrained for many hours.

A documentary was recently prepared that explains the situation. The name of the documentary is “The Mystery of Israel”. Among other things, it accurately addresses the influence of the Rothschilds in Great Britain– the wealthy Jewish international bankers– to establish the nation of Israel during the first half of the 20th century. The video also describes correctly the Scofield Study Bible and its impact.

The documentary argues that an agenda fostered by the world’s elites has fueled much of what we understand about Israel and the recent attacks.

The documentary runs one hour. Midway through the video there is some very disturbing, graphic imagery in connection with the overall discussion. Therefore, do not watch the video if you want to avoid this.

There is also, quite importantly, an overall accurate biblical case made that is very much worth viewing.

Check it out, if you feel led to do so:


4 thoughts on “How Did the Hamas Terrorists Pull Off Their Attacks?

  1. Somebody was asleep at the switch

    I have read that enlisted IDF soldiers on the border, had for weeks, months been observing Hamas activity and training. They were alarmed and reported what they saw. For what ever reasons their warning were not heeded.

    After Oct 7th going forward a system of review should be put in place where the surveillance soldiers can themselves review how their information was handled and raise concerns if the information is ignored too often.

    Why were lower echelon soldiers and officers were ignored. That’s why it’s very important that the army and security apparatus be scrutinized by the press as much as any government bureaucracy. A special commission must be formed

    The IDF was positioned in the wrong places to repel the attack, and warnings from border reconnaissance were ignored. This suggests some elaborate and well-thought out intelligence misinformation campaign from Hamas was successfully carried out, and the Army was expecting an attack elsewhere—perhaps on the West Bank, and at a different date. If this was the case, Israeli intelligence would have to be doubly careful not to say anything, because it could compromise some of their reliable sources.

    Although some media have criticized the political leadership’s failure to prevent Hamas’ onslaught, many outlets are still taking on an active role in trying to push Israel’s broader messaging that the country is battling a war of good vs. evil.

    Talk about sneak attacks.The US had a similar breakdown, December 7, 1941 !!

    In his book In “Day of Deceit, The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor ” Robert Stinnett delivers the definitive final chapter on America’s greatest secret and our worst military disaster.

    Drawing on twenty years of research and access to scores of previously classified documents, Stinnett proves that Pearl Harbor was not an accident, a mere failure of American intelligence, or a brilliant Japanese military coup. By showing that ample warning of the attack was on FDR’s desk and, furthermore, that a plan to push Japan into war was initiated at the highest levels of the U.S. government, he ends up profoundly altering our understanding of one of the most significant events in American history.

    Reflecting a tremendous amount of work digging out original communications documents, previously classified and made available under FOIA, although over a half century later many still remain secret, the author shows that FDR and his minions did maneuver to provoke Japan into an attack against the US and also ordered the Pearl Harbor commanders into passivity as bait to amplify the carnage and enrage Americans. The author makes a strong well documented case. To think otherwise is to deny the authenticity of the declassified documents.

    The US had been monitoring, decoding, and translating Japanese diplomatic and military communications since the early 1920s and by 1941 had twenty-two listening stations arranged around the Pacific Ocean including RDF as well as several different decrypting centers, one of which, HYPO, was located on Oahu itself. FDR was reading secret Japanese messages daily, almost as rapidly as their intended recipients, for over a year before Pearl Harbor and right up until Dec 7 and beyond!

    Japan had been marauding through east Asia for years and had been planning for an eventual war with the USA for decades. Surprise attacks were their forte ever since their defeat of the Russian Navy at Tsushima in 1905, a victory that dominated Japanese naval doctrine and belief in the “decisive battle” ever since. A cynic might say that all FDR did was manipulate them into a first strike on the US in order to unify public opinion.

    CDR Arthur McCollum of the ONI, an expert on Japan and its culture, was the author of the eight-point strategy written in 1940 to provoke Japan to war; he conceived and FDR implemented the deception. Cutting off Japan’s sources of oil and other raw materials was part of it. Another was relocating the US fleet from the west coast of the US to the exposed Hawaii. ADM Richardson, commander of the Pacific fleet, strongly objected. He was relieved and replaced by the more compliant ADM Kimmel. LTG Short commanded Army and Air units on Oahu.

    LCDR Joseph Rochefort, in charge of HYPO, was a longtime colleague and friend of McCollum. His intercepts went directly to FDR and thirty-five others. FDR ordered Rochefort to cut both Kimmel and Short out of the intercept loop starting two weeks prior to Dec 7. Then Kimmel was actually ordered not to patrol Oahu and Short was actually ordered not to go on full alert. FDR, knowing full well that Pearl would be attacked on Dec 7, in an eleventh hour act of gratuitous duplicity, sent a message directly to Hirohito. This was simply to help make a case for plausible deniability, an odious political practice. Adding insult to injury, both Kimmel and Short were made the scapegoats for the disaster.

    After the war Rochefort was quoted, “It was a pretty cheap price to pay for unifying the country.” Would the 2,500 men killed at Pearl that day, and the 2,000 more killed at Wake and Guam agree?

    It is reprehensible that an elected government of a constitutional republic would stealthily betray its own citizens, an act of morally repugnant depravity more typical of a despotic tyranny.

  2. I watched the entire video . There is a multitude of he said … she said narratives going on around the world over this conflict. Maybe God can sort it out. Or perhaps some objective journalists can do a deep dive and get the facts.

Comments are closed.