7 thoughts on “The Rot At The FBI”

  1. Who made the decision for the FBI to manipulate Fakebook & all other media into thinking the Hunter laptop was Russian “disinformation” (when the FBI had had the laptop for 10 months and knew it to be real)? They have “investigation” in their name. That should be straightforward to determine. It was a malicious and treasonous lie. Is it not extremely important for such important crimes to be punished? It may well have determined the election result.

    Who set up this unit to shield the Biden generally? That’s extremely criminal. That’s extremely destructive of that notion of the US as a republic.

    The interviewee is right. End the FBI. It has been corrupt forever. Under Hoover it was extremely corrupt. (Just one of hundreds of examples: Hoover had his agents dig up dirt on all the members of the Warren Commission.) More recently, it covered up the plethora of crimes associated with Epstein and is still doing that. It tilted the election to Biden. It had hundreds of agents in the J6 crowd.

    But watch what the bloodsucking Vampire that is the US Congress will do: They will increase the FBI budget year after year.

    1. There is definitely a “national security” contingent in Congress, J. Sobran– and especially the senate committee on intelligence– that will fight to protect these agencies, and become complicit with their designs. Mike Rogers– running for Senate in Michigan– is one of them. I have little doubt there are “internal” dynamics of which the general public is unaware with regard to this relationship.

      Todd Blanche has a major opportunity now that he has been confirmed. We will see how much he does. We know how much has been achieved thus far addressing these situations– very little.

  2. TC, I personally know about a misconduct matter involving the FBI in the Triad, I will send it you by email.

    Here is a 6 part series , from The Capital Research Center , on some of the FBIs hanky panky over the years. I am sure you will read them. They are fascinating.

    https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-fbis-bad-apples-part-2/

    https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-fbis-bad-apples-part-3/ 

    https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-fbis-bad-apples-part-4/ 

    https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-fbis-bad-apples-part-5/ 

    https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-fbis-bad-apples-part-6/

    1. Thanks for this impressive set of reports, Fred. Will look forward to your e-mail.

      It definitely appears justified to terminate the agency and to build something new in its place, while simultaneously reducing dramatically the total number of intelligence agencies. But there is no political will to make this happen.

      1. The “intelligence agencies” are in the saddle. They control the “political will” of Congress. Point to an instance since the CIA got rid of both the Senate (Frank Church) and House chairmen who tried to investigate them in 1975. 50 years since. Point to an instance of Congress doing anything but saying “yes sir” obsequiously. Even after colossal failures like not telling them the Soviet Union was collapsing, telling them Saddam had WMD, and 9/11 flub. Like Rome, the US Empire is ruled by the Praetorian Guard.

        1. Unfortunately, these agencies’ sway with individual members of Congress– and the premise that some members would be primarily focused on these activities– is well beyond what the Founders intended, J. Sobran. Sometimes, it is appropriate to challenge certain assumptions.

Comments are closed.