This guy’s point is valid. However, some clarification is necessary. Leaving a commune is probably easier than leaving a city or a country.
The United States, Europe, Canada and other “first world” countries all have some degree of socialism built into their systems. We are much more socialist now than we were, say, 75 years ago. These countries have not yet reached the “tipping point” at which large numbers of people begin to leave. Part of the reason is that there are hardly any better places to go.
Meanwhile, full-blown socialist countries like communist China allow their citizens to leave, but most stay. There can be a tendency for people to develop servile, dependent habits.
It appears that most won’t leave until things get really bad; and for these folks to leave, there needs to be a better place to go. And many will not leave.
The tolerance for socialism can vary significantly based on political and economic contexts.
A poll indicated that 40% of Democrats believe socialism is the best form of government, suggesting a level of acceptance.
However, there are concerns about the distribution of wealth and potential economic decline in a socialist system, which may lead to societal challenges.
Ultimately, the tolerance for socialism may depend on the radical demands of certain groups, which could lead to violent repression if not managed properly.
Additionally, critiques of socialism highlight its failing to deliver on promises, which may affect public acceptance.
Thus, the tolerance for socialism is influenced by various factors, including public opinion, economic conditions, and historical experiences.
I agree, Fred. I think we also agree there is too much toleration of socialism.