2 thoughts on “One Socialist Method of Election Fraud (Among Many)”

  1. Several years ago I wrote a letter to the editor ( which was published ) that touched on this scheme:

    News & Record
    9-18-97
    Letter to the editor
    GORE’S BIG QUESTION: IS HE A
    MAN OR A TREE?
    Your fragile apologia for the sleazy, illegal, no restraint fund-raising of Al
    Gore was, of course, predictable and disgustingly kind. (“The system
    victimizes a respectable politician,’ Sept. 9).
        Gore is a dangerous environmental extremist. He favors expansion of
    government. He is a hypocrite regarding tobacco. His book damns the automobile
    as a “moral threat.’ Now he degrades the high office he holds.
        Gore got caught dialing for dollars. His “no controlling legal authority’
    press conference was laughable. First he claimed that “on a few occasions’ he
    made fund-raising calls from the White House for “soft money.’ Upon closer
    examination, “a few’ turned out to be 46. Then it was disclosed by The
    Washington Post that he knew, or should have known, that some of the bucks he
    extorted were to be used by the Clinton-Gore election effort. Hello, Janet
    Reno. The press asked the questions, dug up the answers and viola…the
    attorney general finally triggered the long overdue process to name an
    independent counsel to investigate this sordid mess.The editorial’s attempt to
    excuse Gore’s felonies by blaming reckless staff work is so much guano. First,
    they called the April 1996 Buddhist Temple affair, “community outreach.’ You
    ignore the fact that Gore’s own e-mail refers to the upcoming event as a fund
    raiser. I guess the devil made him do it. Betcha can’t wait to endorse Gore for
    president in 2000, that is if you are able to determine…is he a man or a
    tree? 
    Fred H. Gregory
    Greensboro

     

Comments are closed.