Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
I recall a case back when I was a Magistrate. One of my fellow Magistrates filed a lawsuit alleging alienation of affections
From the N&R:
ALIENATION-OF-AFFECTION SUIT SETTLED\ A GUILFORD COUNTY MAGISTRATE CLAIMS A POLICE OFFICER SEDUCED HIS WIFE AND DESTROYED THEIR MARRIAGE.
BY MIKE FUCHS Staff Writer Oct 9, 2000 Updated Jan 23, 2015
” The case of a Guilford County magistrate who filed an alienation of affection lawsuit against a Greensboro police officer ended in a pretrial settlement Monday.
Terms of the settlement were sealed under court order.In a lawsuit originally filed in Guilford County District Court in 1990, magistrate Chuck Alberson accused officer Samuel Jones Jr. of seducing his wife and destroying his marriage.
Jones denied the allegations.
Alberson refiled the suit in superior court in 1999 because district court judges did not want to hear the case, his attorney Jim Pfaff said. Pfaff said the judges knew both men and wanted to avoid a conflict of interest.
The case was set to be heard Monday morning. But attorneys for both sides settled before court began.
“We’ve been in the process of negotiating for some time,’ Pfaff said.
Pfaff and Marshall Dotson III, Jones’ attorney, declined to comment on the nature of the settlement because the terms are to be kept confidential under court order.
Jones, a detective in the Greensboro Police Department’s criminal investigation division, did not return a telephone message left on his voice mail Monday.
Alberson, who was out of the office Monday, could not be reached for comment.
In the suit, Alberson sought more than $20,000 in punitive and compensatory damages.
Alberson said Jones “maliciously interfered with the marriage’ in seducing his wife before their separation and divorce, according to court papers.
Jones denied the allegations, blaming the breakup of Alberson’s marriage primarily on his “on-going marital misconduct and abuse of his spouse,’ Dotson said in court papers.
To be successful, Alberson would have to prove Jones stole his wife’s love under an old common law doctrine still on the books in North Carolina and a dozen or so other states.
In a nationally publicized Alamance County case, a jury in 1997 awarded Dorothy Hutelmyer$1 million for alienation of affection and criminal conversation, a legal phrase that refers to sexual intercourse or adultery.
Hutelmyer sued ex-husband Joseph Hutelmyer’s second wife, Margie “Lynne’ Cox, for breaking up their marriage.
In July, a Burlington man filed a $40,000 alienation of affection suit against a Louisiana man he claims seduced his wife after they met on the Internet.
Three Randolph County women also filed alienation of affection lawsuits earlier this year.”
Perhaps civil law suit might be best to deal with adultery matters rather make it crime.
I just have this lingering dissatisfaction, Fred, that the jilted spouse suffers an enormous injustice– and experiences awful loss.