Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
It is a fact you can’t please every interest group. A bill has to pass or our taxes will go up.
Trying to get agreement is like trying to herd cats.
Good luck to the leadership in the house and Senate. I wouldn’t want that job.
Fred, there is a part of me that feels if the Republicans had worked better for stronger majorities in Congress, then it would have been possible to pass better legislation. But it all depends on the quality of the people the Republicans elect. And of course, historically, that has been very uneven.
If the mass of Republicans were anything other than Uniparty, they could cut spending. As every last one of them has promised to do when campaigning for 50 years and never done. If the Senate Dems shut down the govt via filibuster, that’s on them. Trump would get to decide what gets the revenue coming in, resulting in defacto cuts galore that Trump prefers. Dems going to benefit from that?
Would the Dems benefit politically from the expiration of the 2017 tax reductions?
Elected on the basis that Republicans were elected in 2024, they can’t cut spending? They can’t eliminate able-bodied single men and illegal alien criminals from getting Medicaid? They can’t in some degree defund the DeepState?
Except for a handful of Republicans like Ron Johnson, Rand Paul, Chip Roy, and Thomas Massey, Republicans are frauds.
Here is the problem with this debate, J. Sobran. Trump, Johnson and their crowd say we need the bill to effectuate deportations and border security. Folks like Paul and Massey say we need spending cuts. In fact, we need BOTH. The subtext of this discussion is that we can only have one or the other, but we can’t have both simultaneously. I think that is tragic that the GOP is so compromised and their goals are so modest. As you say, it is a fraud.
“The subtext of this discussion is that we can only have one or the other, but we canât have both simultaneously.” Kind of like the choice a parent gives a 3 year old they need to manipulate. Why can’t Congressmen who pose as virtuous do what is right in all instances?
The Republican Congress and President are spending and borrowing more than the Biden administration, whose level of spending was grotesquely still at the hugely-elevated level falsely justified by the Plandemic. When you say you are going to clean out the Swamp, and then you lavishly fund that Swamp, you are a fraud.
I can’t fault that reasoning, J. Sobran. We really should be getting back down to pre-2020 levels of spending at the very least. Even then, the deficits were too high, and the debt was mounting rapidly. Their unwillingness to do this suggests some other dynamics are afoot. But ultimately, a political party is fraudulent when it doesn’t even make any pretense of delivering on its program.