He had also come out against an “Israel First” foreign policy; and some have claimed that somehow the Israeli’s had him killed because of this. I doubt that is true.
In this particular video segment, he is merely speaking the truth:
Is This Video Clip Somehow Related To The Reason He Was Killed?
8 thoughts on “Is This Video Clip Somehow Related To The Reason He Was Killed?”
Comments are closed.
My skepticism warning light just came on. I suspect that the video has been edited or doctored .The Rumble upload exists and is posted by TheLibertyDaily (not Kirk’s official channel). That makes it higher risk for selective editing. As far as I can determine there is no verified, full-context source showing Kirk explicitly said Israel/Jewish organizations “engineered” anti-white movements.
Kirk has said that some of the largest financiers of left-wing, anti-white causes have been Jewish Americans. But he has also pushed back against being labeled antisemitic and repeatedly emphasized his support for Israel.
Bottom line in answer to the question posed:
There is also no verified evidence tying Israel or Jewish organizations to Kirk’s killing.
RIP Charlie.
I agree there is no evidence, Fred. If this killing was instigated and/or planned by leftist activist groups, however, we must keep in mind that these are usually financed by Jewish Americans. And I do suspect the killing was instigated and/or planned by one or more leftist activist group.
The substance of what Charlie said in that is all true. ADL is a vicious organization, as anti-free speech as you can get and devoted to the politics of personal destruction.
It is said that Charlie also tried to persuade Trump not to bomb Iran on Israel’s behalf, and that at a meeting with big Israeli donors at Bill Ackman’s mansion on Long Island Charlie was told he better toe the Israeli line. And that he rejected big money from Netanyahu to transform himself into a Mark Levin.
And then there is the modus operandi of Mossad, an organization with ethics even more horrible than the CIA’s.
And finally, there is the incoherence of the story we are being given re the assassination.
So it is only natural to speculate. But that is all it is.
I agree, J. Sobran. It is fair to state that he was becoming more doubtful with regard to matters related to US support of Israel.
And crucially, he was the sparkplug and leader for the generation to come, more dangerous than Tucker Carlson for that reason. The Israelis have reasons to fear that the next generation will not look so favorably on genocide…and be less ready to be cowed by that conversation-ending term ‘anti-Semite’. That word with which any American can be put in his place, back in a box with the non-persons.
The fact that these issues were swirling around immediately prior to his assassination has obviously raised suspicions. But I think it is pretty clear in retrospect that Kirk was regarded as dangerous– as a threat– from a number of different standpoints, i.e., political organizing of young Americans, a possible future president, refusing to buy into the various Jewish agendas, etc.
Although I was quite aware of his work, I never followed him closely because of some of the positions he had taken during his early years. But he obviously had grown over the years and was extremely effective. Somebody felt they had to take him out.
Roger Stone reports that Charlie’s security team was Israeli. Were they the ones who dismantled the crime scene with suspicious speed?
When we have been lied to by Officialdom repeatedly–JFK, RFK, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Covid, “safe & effective,” Russia hoax, squeaky clean election of 2020, Epstein committed suicide and just had all those hundreds of girls for himself and no blackmail victims–and no coherent story comes out after 2 weeks, why would one not be suspicious?
I am a bit concerned that we are not hearing about the organized effort behind this assassination, J. Sobran. I know these things require time; but then I think about the first Trump assassination attempt and recall there is still nothing about the organized effort behind THAT. It seems that the unifying theme of Bondi’s DOJ is deliberateness– to put it charitably. We finally saw an indictment last night and quickly learned the case is assigned to a Biden judge in a jurisdiction that seems very unlikely to convict a socialist.